Sound Equipment

THE ZP800G MODEL IS  NOT JUST ANOTHER CLONE
BUT A NEW IMPROVED VERSION ANNO 2021
OF HOW THE BEST MODERN MIC SHOULD SOUND
COMBINING LEGENDARY KNOWLEDGE AND BUILDING PARTS

ZP800G VS SONY C800G 

Zp vs sony picture_edited_edited_edited.jpg

VS RESPONSE GRAPH

In the frequency response from the ZP800G and Sony c800g. We can see A striking similarity especially the low and mid section are extreme identical. The highs are also striking similar. we can see they booth peak at minus +-6db but the ZP having A flatter but more fuller and smoother response in the top around 10 khz. and A more prominent response in the vocal definition area around 7500khz. this giving The ZP A more clear focused sound while remaining full and smooth. You can also see in the Graph the ZP800G 18khz top roll-of is more smooth. This translates in the more gradient open sound.

When recording and processing /Mixing sharp or sibilant voices the high frequencies of the Sony can become sharp and unpleasant quite quick . But because of the flatter but fuller top end of the ZP800G this is no issue when recording such sources because its already molded as if it was compressed and De-essed upfront. The ZP800G needs no additional EQ fixes or de-essers to control the highs and still providing the same solid lows and mids for your recording.

ZP VS SONY FILE FREQ paint_edited.png

ZP800G VS SONY 800G COMPARISON VIDEO

 simultaneously recording of the ZP800g and the Sony c800g
on A 1073 heritage into A Apollo X - using A Pauly ton pop filter.


Recording elements: - vocal male - Guitar - Triangle - wood sticks

RECORDING EXAMPLE UAD IN THE BOX

Recording of the ZP800G  in the box with universal
and Neumann U87ai comparison

audio plugins:


Neve 1073 - 1176-purple - EMT 140.

 

ua_stacked_white_edited.png